Trump breaking the rules of Washington's money game
By: Rachel Marsden
PARIS -- Republican presidential front-runner Donald Trump got into an
interesting war of words on Twitter last week with a Saudi prince.
"Dopey Prince (Al-Waleed bin Talal) wants to control our U.S. politicians with
daddy's money. Can't do it when I get elected," Trump tweeted.
Trump's social-media salvo was truly provocative, and not because he called a
billionaire member of the Saudi royal family "dopey." What made Trump's outburst
on Twitter so interesting was his willingness to call out the tacit and
longstanding subversion of the U.S. political system by foreign interests.
"You are a disgrace not only to the GOP but to all of America," bin Talal
tweeted back. "Withdraw from the U.S. presidential race as you will never win."
It was nice to see the prince make good use of the social media service in which
he owns some 30 million shares.
It must be amusing to American voters when foreign dignitaries demand that
candidates withdraw from political campaigns, presumably hoping for more
controllable candidates to carry the day.
Meanwhile, some of America's domestic princes -- the billionaires who throw
money at their preferred candidates -- are sitting back and waiting to decide
which candidate to support against Trump, the current favorite of the Republican
masses, who's running partly on the premise that he won't take the donors' cash.
The American political system is being subverted both domestically and
internationally. On the domestic front, billionaires donate money to political
action committees that support politicians who then are expected to vote in
favor of legislation favoring the billionaires' business activities. Some
politicians have investments in the billionaires' companies, so by supporting
policies that help the billionaires, the politicians are also helping
themselves. Meanwhile, the average person who doesn't have enough chips to take
part in this high-stakes game is left playing the penny slots.
The game is played much the same way at the international level, with wealthy
players putting down bets on candidates whose policies could yield handsome
rewards.
Trump has been operating at the highest level of international business long
enough to know how the game is played and who the players are. Unlike some other
businessmen who have run for president (Mitt Romney comes to mind), Trump is a
truly independent entrepreneur who is beholden to no one. So if Trump wants to
spill someone's secrets, he doesn't have to first triangulate it with supporters
before letting it rip.
Most Fox News Channel viewers are probably unaware that the Saudi royal family's
Kingdom Holding Company owns a significant stake in Fox News' parent company.
Saudi cash flows freely into Washington through lobbyists and public relations
firms. As long as it's all disclosed under the Foreign Agents Registration Act,
there's nothing unlawful about it -- and Saudi Arabia certainly isn't the only
nation leveraging the loopholes provided by Washington to keep the K Street
machine well greased.
When U.S. President Barack Obama killed the Keystone XL pipeline, which would
have been a cornerstone of North American energy independence, Saudi oil
interests benefitted. When the Obama administration joined Saudi Arabia and
Qatar in training Syrian "rebels" to unseat Syrian President Bashar al-Assad --
who threatens Saudi and Qatari influence in the region because he favors Russia
rather than them -- many Americans wondered why the U.S. was getting involved.
When Saudi Arabia finally got its hands dirty in the counterterrorism fray, it
focused on the Iranian-backed Houthis on its own border. And the Saudis haven't
offered to take in any of the Middle Eastern refugees currently flooding into
Europe. Are any U.S. leaders are speaking up about this?
The Saudis have just announced the formation of a Riyadh-based "Islamic military
alliance" consisting of 34 countries from the Middle East, Africa and Asia --
but not Iran and Russia, the only two nations in the region that are killing
members of the Islamic State. The objective of this alliance? To fight
terrorism. It's absurd that Saudi Arabia is leading a counterterrorism coalition
to take on the terrorists it has helped to create, but don't expect U.S.
officials to call the Saudis on it.
It's one thing to have trade relationships, but such deals should stand on their
own. Such agreements are intended to benefit all Americans. But many of the
political dealings with other nations are detrimental to Americans' interests.
More power to Trump for knowing the difference and highlighting it for all the
world to see.
COPYRIGHT 2015 RACHEL MARSDEN