US-backed protégés in Africa ditch their training wheels to stage a coup
By: Rachel Marsden
PARIS — Another group of Pentagon star trainees — this time in Niger — has
taken over the shop, ousting their Western-allied president in a coup. Behold,
your tax dollars at work, America.
“Niger is the largest recipient of State Department military assistance in West
Africa and the second highest in Sub-Saharan Africa,” the State Department
boasted of its “strategic partnership” with the country in March of this year.
Fast-forward just a few months, and now Secretary of State Antony Blinken is
pausing some of that funding, underscoring that “the provision of US assistance
to the government of Niger depends on democratic governance and respect for
constitutional order.”
Presumably the canceled aid would also include the US taxpayer cash shoveled out
the door to the latest coup’s leaders — albeit a bit too late. “The benefit from
the joint mortar training event is two-fold – providing Nigerien soldiers with a
tangible skill, while also bolstering the partnership between U.S. and Niger
forces,” wrote the Pentagon in June 2021 of a joint training exercise.
One of the star Nigerien students cited was Col. Maj. Moussa Salaou Barmou, who
ultimately became a brigadier general and the head of the country’s special
forces.
“We have had a very long relationship with the United States. Being able to work
together in this capacity is very good for Niger,” Barmou said at the time. US
Special Operations in Africa Commander Lt. Gen. Jonathan Braga also met with
Barmou just a few weeks ago at a U.S. drone base in Niger, according to a
Pentagon social media account, complete with photos of the meeting.
Barmou, now identified as one of the coup’s leaders, previously trained at Fort
Benning, Georgia, and Washington’s National Defense University, according to The
Intercept, and has just been named the army’s chief of staff by the military
junta. What could possibly have led Washington to believe that their approach
could ultimately backfire? Apparently not the fact that onetime CIA asset Osama
bin Laden — who worked with the US against the Soviets in Afghanistan — later
used his experience to attack American interests. Or Washington’s training of
police in various Latin American countries, as cover for CIA intelligence
gathering, that enabled death squads.
Or the fact that five other African countries’ whose soldiers were trained by
the US — Mali, Burkina Faso, Guinea, Mauritania, and Gambia — have already
undergone coups.
So what exactly was the point of the US being in Niger in the first place,
beyond hanging out near a wealth of natural resources and pretending not to be
interested? Even the most interventionist US senators hadn’t a clue when it
emerged in October 2017 that four American special forces had been killed in a
jihadist ambush. “I didn’t know there was 1,000 troops in Niger. … They are
going to brief us next week as to why they were there and what they were doing,”
Sen. Lindsey Graham told NBC’s “Meet the Press” at the time. Officially, US and
Western presence in this sub-Saharan region related to counterterrorism and
stabilization operations — which were such a resounding success that it has led
to a proliferation of coups and to the region being named the global epicenter
of terrorism by the Institute of Economics and Peace’s 2023 Global Terrorism
Index.
Niger even gets a special mention for its terrorism surge. If a plumber arrived
at your home and ended up trashing it under the pretext of fixing your toilet,
you might end up coming to the conclusion that either he sucked at his job or
else had other motivations.
The post-coup leader of Burkina Faso, 35-year-old army Captain Ibrahim Traoré,
provided a glimpse into the rationale behind the power grabs last week while
attending a summit of African nations in Russia. “The questions my generation is
asking are … how Africa, with so much wealth on our soil, with generous nature,
water, sunshine in abundance, is the poorest continent?”
He then asked Russian President Vladimir Putin for Russian know-how to bring
nuclear energy to his country, one of the world’s least electrified nations with
only a fifth of the country having access to electricity in 2020, according to
the International Energy Agency.
Without decent energy and infrastructure, they’ll always be poor, and their
Western allies didn’t seem to be in a big hurry to make the transition from
bombs to bridges as long as they could still pull the treasure out of the ground
to fuel their own needs.
So out go the pro-Western leaders of these countries and in come the backers of
a new approach that favors China and Russia for their joint infrastructure,
security, and energy capabilities. The end result? Western access to Africa’s
critical mineral wealth that drives everything from our consumer to nuclear
technology has arguably never been more in jeopardy. And all due to the unforced
errors and total lack of foresight of our incompetent leaders.
COPYRIGHT 2023 RACHEL MARSDEN