Two Very Different Neighbours
By: Rachel Marsden
On the 4th of July, a crowd of thousands gathered on Brooklyn's Coney Island
to watch people stuff as many hotdogs down their throats as possible in five
minutes.
Eating as a competitive sport, not just a means of survival. ESPN commentators
going into detail about the various techniques involved (i.e. "chipmunking") and
how these "athletes" control their stomach muscles in order to maximize scarfing.
At that moment, I was acutely reminded that I was not in Canada anymore.
Meanwhile, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration is actually considering a
request by "big candy" (again, only in the U.S.) to allow actual chocolate to be
omitted from chocolate and replaced with flavoured veggie oils.
And people wonder why they gain weight just from eating normally. It's because
you're pretty much eating plastic. Canadians are tolerant, but draw the line at
our snacks becoming a stunt double for Lego.
I learned another lesson about the difference between the two cultures when I
appeared on a TV show with presidential candidate, Congressman Dennis Kucinich.
After allowing Kucinich to speak virtually unchallenged for several minutes, the
host then said that Kucinich had one more minute before the commercial break.
Ever the seasoned pro, Kucinich used the opportunity to machine gun the rest of
his liberal talking points. With a few seconds left, I said that I loved how he
waited until the last minute, when he couldn't be challenged, to spew all his
crap.
Apparently, people here just don't talk that way to politicians.
Growing up in the birthplace of talk radio (Vancouver, B.C.), I'm used to talk
show hosts throwing their curve balls hard and fast, and publicly calling out
politicians on their spin, rather than just doing it behind their back. The
politicians always return for more because there's pride in surviving a
grilling. And it's exciting, compelling entertainment.
This approach reflects the fact that, unlike in the US,
even Canada’s Prime Minister has to stand in the House of Commons every day and
personally respond to flying questions and accusations from the people.
Despite working in U.S. politics and media for most of my adult life and having
more knowledge of and love for America than many of its citizens, there's one
question that I'm often asked: "As a Canadian, what qualifies you to talk about
U.S. politics?"
As a Canadian, I was unfortunately unable to personally attend every event in
American politics since the Civil War. Since I was born a few miles north of the
Canada/U.S. border, I had to learn about and witness them through books and
media -- apparently, unlike my American counterparts.
In my hometown, the two main news anchors were English and American, and the top
talk radio host was a Scotsman. No one thought twice about it. Maybe it's
because in Canada, we know our politicians are idiots who don't have all the
answers.
Heaven forbid that an entrepreneur with international experience and a global
perspective wants to come to the U.S., pay taxes, and reinvigorate the national
debate. Apparently in this industry, those types of people are only allowed to
sign our cheques.
Nowadays, even if the U.S. government certifies someone as one of the top
political commentators in the world, you're more likely to end up talking about
Britney Spears' crotch. If the winning strategy for the war on terror was in
there, you can bet we'd have it by now.
PUBLISHED: TORONTO SUN (July 10/07)
COPYRIGHT 2007 RACHEL MARSDEN