Special counsel investigation could help end foreign influence-peddling
By: Rachel Marsden
PARIS -- As the special counsel investigation headed by former FBI Director
Robert Mueller grinds on, some might be wondering what's taking so long.
Although Mueller's primary mandate was to investigate potential Russian
interference in the 2016 presidential election, the special counsel and his team
have license to pursue other leads that might involve the sort of criminal
conduct and corruption that has become normalized -- some might call it
"business as usual" -- in Washington.
Some of the first charges brought by Mueller's team involved systemic
corruption. Gen. Michael Flynn , the former Defense Intelligence Agency director
and President Donald Trump 's national security adviser for 24 days, was less
than forthright about his lobbying activities on behalf of Turkey right up until
the 2016 election, according to Justice Department filings. House Democrats
issued a report last month that expressed concern over Flynn's role in selling
Trump on a plan to sell sensitive American nuclear technology to Saudi Arabia.
Trump's short-lived campaign chairman, Paul Manafort, who had been an
international wheeler-dealer for years, was convicted on multiple counts of tax
and bank fraud.
It would be a mistake to interpret finance-related convictions as having nothing
to do with politics. High-end political corruption involves money, which is
tangible and traceable, and financial crimes often carry heavy penalties.
Some financial crimes, such as money laundering, can be tried at both the state
and federal levels. So if someone is counting on a presidential pardon, which
can only apply to federal crimes, they can't escape justice if they're also
convicted of a financial crime at the state level.
One of the criticisms leveled at the special counsel investigation is that it
places Trump's entourage under the microscope for activities that have long been
standard operating procedure in Washington. Why, for example, could the Clinton
Foundation solicit millions of dollars from foreign governments while Hillary
Clinton was serving as secretary of state?
Trump is probably correct when he claims that his administration is being held
to a different standard. Are the Beltway grifters clinging to Trump any more
tightly than they clung to his predecessors? Not necessarily. Some of them have
been hanging around looking to profit from "their guy" being in office since at
least the George W. Bush administration.
The special counsel investigation could conceivably cover ALL forms of foreign
interference in American politics, and the investigation may not lead where
anyone initially thought it would.
Earlier this week, the House Judiciary Committee sent letters and document
requests to 81 individuals and entities associated with the Trump
administration, campaign, businesses and transition team members. At least some
of the letters explicitly request documents related to "Trump Campaign or Trump
Transition contacts or communications with or regarding the Russian Federation,
the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, or Saudi Arabia."
Despite the pretext of purported Russian interference serving as a starting
point, the House inquiry (like Mueller's) could very well end up revealing
attempts by other countries -- notably Persian Gulf states -- to influence
American politics.
Russian money carries very little weight in Washington, but the quest to uncover
Russian interference may end up being the spark that burns down the entire
corrupt Washington system.
Mueller would need to detail the undue influence that foreign countries have on
America's leadership and send a strong message by indicting those caught
self-servingly colluding with other nations to undermine America's interests.
Unless Mueller is able to impose serious consequences for such collusion, we
will always see things that don't make sense: new wars, lack of interest in
ending old ones, double standards involving so-called "rogue states," and even
tolerance toward gruesome acts of murder and the sponsorship of terrorism.
Just because Washington has long been a cesspool doesn't mean that it should
always be one. Nor does it mean that Trump should get a pass because his
predecessors did. If there's an immediate opportunity to enact change, it should
be seized.
It may be Trump's misfortune that the music just happens to stop while he's in
office. But if Mueller succeeds in shining a bright light on how foreign money
rigs politics against citizens' best interests, America will be better for it.
COPYRIGHT 2019 RACHEL MARSDEN