Western elites are exploiting the Ukraine conflict to lower the standard of living
By: Rachel Marsden
It seems to be a continuation of the trend where you must sacrifice for 
the greater global good or be ostracized by the thought police
It’s impossible to escape the constant undertone of the need to sacrifice for 
the greater global good or else be viewed as a selfish prick. And now, you risk 
even worse branding by the thought police if you don’t fall in line with this 
new outlook: That of a Putin-enabler. 
Since Russia launched its military campaign in Ukraine, Western elites have been 
arguing that we all must collectively and senselessly concede to lowering our 
basic standards of living in order to hit back at President Vladimir Putin. In 
reality, all it does is allow them to continue to profit from our increasingly 
lowered expectations while all we get in return is the satisfaction of our own 
virtue signaling. 
French Minister of the Economy Bruno Le Maire called on all the French to “make 
an effort” on their energy consumption to cope with the rising prices. People 
should “realize that we’re entering into a new world” amid the conflict in 
Ukraine, in which we “must accelerate our independence vis-à-vis fossil fuel,” 
he said in an interview with the news channel BFMTV earlier in March. 
Meanwhile, France’s ecological transition minister, Barbara Pompili, announced 
that public institutions would be asked to “reduce by one degree” their heating 
in response to the spike in energy prices since the onset of the conflict. 
Le Maire let the cat out of the bag in evoking a “new world” – a phrase which 
seems to be on the lips of top western officials these days, including US 
President Joe Biden earlier this week at a business round table. “Now is a time 
when things are shifting and there’s going to be a new world order out there, 
and we’ve got to lead it,” Biden said. “We’ve got to unite the rest of the free 
world in doing it.”
And chief EU diplomat Josep Borrell has also asked Europeans to “cut the 
umbilical cord that connects with Russia,” by using less heating, apparently 
unaware that it could potentially be redirected to other markets while Europeans 
sit around waiting for their newfound beaming virtue to generate heat. 
There has long been American pressure on Europe to cut itself off from Russian 
gas. The hostility towards the needs of the average citizen living within the 
European Union has been framed as looking out for their best interests against 
Russia. The “Protecting Europe’s Energy Security Act of 2019” was designed to 
sanction corporations involved in the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline construction to 
“address Russian pipeline projects that create risks to U.S. national security, 
threaten Europe’s energy security, and consequently, endanger Europe’s political 
and economic welfare.” 
Not surprisingly, the legislation was introduced by Ted Cruz, a Republican 
senator from “big oil” Texas, which could eventually profit from the EU losing 
Russia as its supplier. According to US government data, in 2021, the EU was 
buying about 2.3 million barrels a day of Russian crude oil and condensate – or 
49 % of the country’s exports.
The problem is that there are no immediate practical substitutions for Russian 
energy. And while turning down “Putin’s gas” in your French home may be 
appropriate in any case – and I speak as someone who has never once turned on 
the heat in my home in 13 years of French living – there’s something else going 
on here. It seems like politicians are exploiting the current situation to 
condition people to accept paying more while accepting less value, and with no 
real end or practical solution in sight. The fact that Le Maire manipulatively 
played on emotions by evoking images of Ukrainian children in an appeal for 
basic energy conservation should raise red flags.
Likewise, German Agriculture Minister Cem Ozdemir told Spiegel magazine that 
people should fight Putin by changing their diet. “Despite the fact that I am a 
vegetarian, I will not preach that everyone should go vegetarian,” he said. “But 
let’s put it this way: Eating less meat would be a contribution against Putin.”
This message is brought to us by the same elites who routinely peddle the idea 
of westerners eating bugs in mainstream media. Ozedemir’s request has nothing to 
do with Putin or Ukraine and everything to do with this obsession of 
relentlessly guilting the average person into complying with, and pressuring one 
another into, lowering their own living standards under the pretext of fighting 
climate change, or Putin, or whatever other cockamamie excuse they think you’ll 
accept.
Meanwhile, Bill Gates, Microsoft co-founder, climate change fighter, and 
relentless vaccine peddler, has become the largest private farmland owner in the 
United States and is set up to be one of the big beneficiaries of a meatless 
future. Particularly when considering that Gates has openly supported 
genetically modified food production, while the Bill and Melinda Gates 
Foundation has invested millions into the genetically modified food company, 
Monsanto, according to NBC News. Other Silicon Valley billionaires are also 
investing in fake food production, including PayPal founder Peter Thiel and 
Google co-founder Sergey Brin.
This makes one wonder if it’s really about sticking it to Putin and not about 
the wealthy trying to convince you to advocate against your own best interests.
Not even your sacred pets are safe. A Bloomberg News opinion piece suggested 
recently that people should cut corners on the health of their companion animals 
in this period of crisis-provoked inflation. “If you’re one of the many 
Americans who became a new pet owner during the pandemic, you might want to 
rethink those costly pet medical needs,” the piece stated.
Another op-ed in France’s Liberation newspaper asks: “How far are we prepared 
to go in economic sanctions against Russia and what they mean in our daily 
lives?” 
It’s impossible to escape the constant undertone of the need to sacrifice for 
the greater global good or else be viewed as a selfish prick. And now, you risk 
even worse branding by the thought police if you don’t fall in line with this 
new outlook: That of a Putin-enabler. 
At this rate, we’ll soon be at the point where if you aren’t living at the same 
standard as a Ukrainian refugee, then you’re an earth-killing, gas-guzzling, 
democracy-hating glutton who has no business participating in polite society. If 
you think that it can’t happen, just ask any of those who were shunned and 
marginalized without pity, losing their jobs, lifestyle, or freedom of travel 
amid the Covid crisis when they refused to get vaccinated in order to obtain the 
coveted digital health pass.
Western elites are exploiting this crisis to accelerate a long articulated 
agenda that seems destined to lead to collective impoverishment to the benefit 
of a select few. They point and scream at Russia, advancing their pawns and 
scapegoats from behind fake virtue. Don’t fall for it. 
COPYRIGHT 2022 RACHEL MARSDEN