Canada Quits Kyoto Protocol, Dodges Tax Bullet
By: Rachel Marsden
In a victory for common sense, America’s top trading partner has become the
first country to bail on the Kyoto Protocol before the nearly $7 billion in
non-compliance costs comes due next year. Thus ends a pointless and pricey
exercise in martyrdom.
Having committed to reducing 1990 level carbon emissions by 6%, Canada somehow
managed to go in the other direction by about a third. Not that anyone in Canada
would have noticed by any tangible common-sense measure, except perhaps for all
the Canadian plants and trees quietly cheering the abundance of carbon dioxide
and overproducing fresh oxygen as a result.
So what exactly is the almighty valid scientific reason for which a well-managed
country with a natural resource based economy would purposely choose to
sacrifice its competitive advantage amid economic uncertainty, particularly when
oil and natural resource competitor Russia has a mandate to reduce its emissions
by exactly zero, and America wisely didn’t even sign the agreement?
Environmentalism is all feel-good fun and games until taxpayers get mugged.
Times and priorities have changed and scammy nonsense like taxing and trading in
plant food credits has lost its luster. Protesters are already complaining about
Wall Street. We really don’t need yet another dodgier market system to hear them
whine about.
Carbon reduction is just a luxury pastime, and arguably a useless one. Where can
you breathe better: “carbon-dumping” Canada or Europe? I rest my case.
Europe has long been proudly fiddling with carbon credits both amongst
themselves and on the world stage. Good for them. Given the current economic
state of the Eurozone, it’s obvious they’ve been busy debating wallpaper samples
while the bulldozer rolls full-speed towards the house. Good luck saving the
world when you can’t pay the rent. Europe will probably keep trying to impose
its moral example through climate change activism, even when they’re in debt to
China and Russia, each of which have zero Kyoto obligations.
A developed country under the carbon tax system can choose to offset its guilt
with actions rather than cash transfers to less industrialized countries. Nice
racket. So Canada may have been able to reduce its billions owing with
“do-gooder credits,” furiously running around the world planting trees,
French-kissing rainbow trout, hosting one rock concert on Arctic ice floes
featuring Bono for every gigatonne of carbon spewed, or something else equally
absurd.
Canadian Conservative Party Prime Minister Stephen Harper reiterated at a
Toronto press conference this week that his government was committed to working
with the private sector in the ongoing development of emissions reduction
technology, thereby differentiating between a heartfelt morally genuine effort
and a crippling, political imposition.
Existing gentlemen’s agreements between provinces and American regions on
emission reduction might be a fun distraction from practical life, like a
badminton league or hockey pool. They should never have been parlayed into
something that costs anyone more than a beer, let alone billions.
Canadian opposition parties predictably whined about not being allowed to tag
along with the Environment Minister to the recent Durban summit where they were
hoping to run around profusely apologizing for the government’s lack of
sensitivity in saving Canadian taxpayers a multi-billion dollar bill, with one
even calling the Minister a “piece of s**t” aloud in parliament upon his return.
The Liberal Party’s environment critic accused Harper’s government of ignoring
the “science” of this: “While the world emits 48 gigatonnes of carbon each year,
most models suggest that emissions need to drop to 44 gigatonnes by 2020 to
maintain a likely chance (66%) of remaining under 2 degrees Celsius”
Harper should have responded that this overwrought, overfunded reasoning can be
alleviated, according to bought scientific consensus, by running 6 to 11 million
barrels of Canadian crude (or Molson Canadian beer) over a leftist brain at 40C
to maintain a 66% chance of reducing its temperature to 38C by 2020.
The Socialist NDP official opposition leader added: “While the Harper
Conservatives are causing Canada to fall behind, the rest of the world is moving
forward in the new energy economy.”
Good for “the rest of the world.” Have fun playing with your new taxes. The rest
of us have real problems to deal with.
COPYRIGHT 2011 RACHEL MARSDEN