Trump's withdrawal from Iran deal is a mistake
By: Rachel Marsden
PARIS -- U.S. President Donald Trump had long been expected to renege on the
deal that America and five other nations struck with Iran in 2015, and he did so
on Tuesday. The immediate impact: U.S. sanctions against Iran are back on.
However, it’s the long-term impact that could make this one of the worst moves
ever made by an American president.
Whether Trump is aware of it or not, withdrawing from the Iran nuclear deal
could reorient many of the pieces on the global chessboard — and not in
America’s favor.
First, the withdrawal conveys the message that America’s promises are worthless,
even when they’re in writing. Trump has been hoping to negotiate a detente with
North Korea, which by most estimates now has a nuclear bomb. Now, North Korea is
witnessing a broken U.S. promise and can easily place itself in Iran’s shoes.
Why would North Korean President Kim Jong Un give up his nuclear weaponry after
seeing America back out of the Iran deal?
Last year, Trump boasted about his volte-face on America’s recent detente with
Cuba. He placed restrictions on travel to Cuba and blocked U.S. companies from
doing business with any companies associated with the Cuban military (which is
difficult to avoid since the military touches every sector in the country). If
the U.S. business community can’t rely on Trump to provide a stable environment
for international business development, how can Kim trust him?
Turkey and the Philippines seem to believe that the sword of Damocles is hanging
over their longstanding defense and security cooperation with the U.S.,
prompting both countries to look to Russia and China.
Second, Trump’s decision is a slap in the face to America’s Western allies, many
of which are home to multinational companies that have started doing business in
Iran since the ratification of the nuclear deal. Trump’s reimposition of
sanctions against Iran means that these companies have to worry about violating
the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, risking prosecution and billion-dollar
fines. Foreign companies with a presence on Wall Street (or even foreign
companies whose emails pass through a U.S. server, or who conduct transactions
through a U.S. bank) fall under American jurisdiction.
Allies who believe that they can’t rely on America to keep its promises from one
administration to the next will be motivated to seek out other options. The main
beneficiary of this is Russia, which has long been conveying the message that
the U.S. is a less-than-reliable partner. Russia has also been working with
China to build an alternative banking architecture. If this new architecture
enables European countries to bypass a U.S. system that controls their access to
markets, then Trump will have emboldened the competition at America’s expense.
Third, the move would slam the door on any opportunity to build the kind of
relationships that Western intelligence agencies seeking insight into Iran can
only dream about. The five hardest intelligence-collection targets are widely
considered to be North Korea, Iran, Russia, China and France. In the first four
cases, it’s because access is so difficult. (In the case of France, it’s because
key decisions are very tightly held near the top of the food chain and
spy-busting counterintelligence is aggressive.) With Iran and North Korea,
America was on the verge of prying open those vaults without firing a shot — not
with boots on the ground but with business shoes. And isn’t that the ultimate
objective? Aren’t spying, aggression and warfare largely about the prospect of
economic gain?
Of course, national security is a viable pretext for international conflict,
too. And that brings me to my final point.
The U.S. withdrawal from the nuclear deal confirms Iran hard-liners’ earlier
suspicions that abandonment of nuclear self-defense capabilities would prove to
be foolish, because even a signed deal is no guarantee that a friend today won’t
decide to become your foe tomorrow.
From the outset, Trump has been strangely obsessed with the Iran deal even
though it’s become clear that he doesn’t understand all of its implications.
It’s the rare issue on which he finds himself in lockstep with the Washington
establishment. (And many of those establishment members benefit from the
largesse of Iran’s regional foes.) That should have been Trump’s first warning
sign.
Trump has long seemed intent on undoing one of the rare things that Obama
actually got right. The decision to ditch the Iran deal could change the world —
and not in a way that benefits America, global security or the free market.
COPYRIGHT 2018 RACHEL MARSDEN