US whining over Huawei 5G is hard to take seriously
By: Rachel Marsden
PARIS — If the U.K. allows Chinese multinational Huawei to participate in
building a new-generation cellular communications network, the CIA is going to
take its ball and go home. That’s the message Mick Mulvaney, U.S. President
Donald Trump’s acting chief of staff, delivered in a speech at the Oxford Union
last week just before his meeting with British officials.
Mulvaney and Trump are concerned that your selfies and your mom’s Facebook rants
about the neighbor could be laughed at by some military intelligence officer in
Beijing via secret backdoors installed in Huawei equipment. Those who don’t know
any better say they’re thankful that the U.S. government is looking out for
them.
Yes, it would be a noble gesture if the CIA hadn’t beaten the Chinese to the
possibility of peering at the direct messages you exchange with your high school
ex.
A Washington Post report earlier this month revealed that the CIA teamed for
years with the West German BND intelligence service on a decades-long spying
operation. The two intelligence agencies secretly owned a Swiss company called
Crypto AG that sold encryption machines to more than 120 governments worldwide.
The machines were rigged with backdoors so that codes could easily be broken.
The Swiss government has launched an investigation into the alleged CIA front
company’s activities.
It’s probably best to just assume that all governments are spying online and
behave accordingly to minimize your exposure if you’re concerned about it.
Meanwhile, the U.S. government will keep prattling on about Huawei in an attempt
to negate a Chinese competitive advantage on the global economic playing field.
All the noise about national security is meant to obscure the panic that the
U.S. can’t compete with Huawei’s technology at a time when the entire world is
on the verge of upgrading to 5G networks. Economically speaking, the U.S. has no
goalie and no players on the ice, leaving China free to score into an empty net
— over and over again, all over the world.
Attorney General Bill Barr recently suggested that the U.S. buy controlling
shares in Huawei’s only two 5G competitors: Finland’s Nokia and Sweden’s
Ericsson.
“Putting our large market and financial muscle behind one or both of these firms
would make it a more formidable competitor and eliminate concerns over its
staying power,” Barr said. “We and our closest allies certainly need to be
actively considering this approach.”
Barr’s remarks have been poorly received here in Europe. The suggestion that the
U.S. should buy controlling shares of two European multinationals is being
viewed in the context of a longstanding U.S. effort to economically colonize
Europe by buying its industrial know-how piece by piece and using it to further
American interests. The recent use of U.S. anti-corruption laws to selectively
prosecute European multinationals — in some cases leading to the buyouts of the
weakened firms — have exasperated European industry.
The case of Alstom here in France is one example of a U.S. buyout that has led
to European wariness. In 2014, the U.S. Justice Department extracted a record
$772 million from the French power and transportation company to settle foreign
bribery charges. A year later, Alstom’s power division (and French nuclear
assets and know-how) were sold to General Electric, the highly subsidized U.S.
multinational and defense contractor sometimes jokingly referred to as
“Government Electric.”
Before anyone argues that Alstom (or France) deserved the punishment because it
shouldn’t have acted corruptly in the first place, consider that Nigeria, which
ranked 146th of 180 countries on Transparency International’s Corruption
Perceptions Index for 2019, enjoys $9 billion in bilateral trade with the U.S.,
which is also Nigeria’s largest foreign investor. And despite Nigeria having a
corruption ranking on par with that of heavily sanctioned Iran, which the U.S.
considers a persistent global menace, the U.S. can’t seem to find any corruption
in Nigeria to prosecute. Funny how that works, isn’t it?
National security threats blown out of proportion have become a tool for
frustrated hustlers looking to sabotage deals. Huawei is the latest example, but
we’ve seen it before. Just last year, America’s NATO ally, Turkey, purchased the
Russian-made S-400 air defense system, widely regarded as the best in its class
as a result of Russia prioritizing electronic warfare research even after the
Cold War. Trump responded by threatening Turkey with sanctions over what
Washington described as a security vulnerability for NATO and for the Lockheed
Martin F-35 fighter jet. So much whining and complaining. How about just
building a better F-35 jet without such vulnerabilities?
Countries grow stronger in a diverse, multipolar world where there are competing
options. This concept lies at the very heart of capitalist philosophy. China and
others are now playing the game that we’ve always wanted them to play. They’ve
leveled up. Washington needs to stop whining about it.
COPYRIGHT 2020 RACHEL MARSDEN