Signs are emerging that Washington is getting fed up with Ukraine
By: Rachel Marsden
PARIS — It looks like Washington is starting to lay the groundwork for an 
exit ramp from Ukraine — by throwing down some Ukrainian officials as speed 
bumps.
Over just the past few days, the Washington Post — one of the go-to media 
outlets for the U.S. intelligence community and Washington establishment — has 
run two bombshell stories that effectively pin the blame on Ukraine for events 
that have caused major friction between the West and Russia.
A piece published on October 23, citing unnamed officials, reveals that covert 
assassinations against Russian citizens inside Russia were carried out by 
Ukrainian intelligence — notably the targeted killing of Russian political 
scientist, journalist, and activist, Daria Dugina, who died when a bomb blew up 
the car she was driving just outside of Moscow last year. The piece also cites 
drone strikes on residential buildings in Moscow, also attributed to Ukraine. It 
takes great pains to underscore that the CIA’s only interest has been to train 
Ukrainians to gather intelligence against Russia, solely for defensive purposes. 
To that end, since 2014, it has “provided Ukraine with advanced surveillance 
systems, trained recruits at sites in Ukraine as well as the United States, 
built new headquarters for departments in Ukraine’s military intelligence 
agency, and shared intelligence,” according to the Post.
It’s pretty clear that whatever training wheels the CIA may have put on Ukraine 
have come flying off. And now we’re supposed to conveniently believe that the 
CIA is suddenly clutching its pearls.
On November 11, the Post ran yet another piece that attributed the Nord Stream 
pipeline attack to a Ukrainian intelligence officer who took orders from other, 
more senior, Ukrainian intelligence officials. The officer in question told the 
Washington Post, as they looked into his rumored involvement, that the 
allegations were“ Russian propaganda.” But Russian President Vladimir Putin 
himself has repeatedly blamed Washington for the sabotage of Europe’s industrial 
lifeline of gas from Russia, calling the notion of Ukrainian responsibility 
“complete nonsense.”
“An explosion of this kind, of this power, at this depth can only be carried out 
by specialists, and supported by the full power of the state, which has certain 
technologies," Putin said earlier this year. After all, U.S. President Joe Biden 
did say, even before the conflict started, that if Russia moved into Ukraine, 
then they’d “bring an end” to the pipeline whose destruction has caused 
Germany’s economy to sink ever since, and its industry to bail out to countries 
with more favorable energy supply — like the U.S.
Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Seymour Hersh reported back in February that 
the pipeline attacks were the result of a covert intelligence operation 
orchestrated at the highest levels in Washington.
So if Ukrainian officials, like the one now being fingered for blowing up Nord 
Stream, are looking to blame anyone for these rumors, they may want to look 
westward. Because it sure seems like there’s an emerging trend to suddenly frame 
America’s involvement with Ukraine as well-meaning and strictly defensive — and 
to suggest that if Ukraine chewed through its harness, then Washington can 
hardly be held responsible.
So why might all of this be coming out now? The obvious explanation is that 
Ukraine has turned out to be more trouble than it’s worth to Washington, 
particularly amid renewed conflict in the Middle East. The West has used Ukraine 
as little more than a battering ram against Russia for as long as it possibly 
can. By contrast, events in the Middle East between Gaza and Israel have already 
blown back onto the U.S., lighting destabilizing fires of protest, resistance, 
and violence within the U.S. and other Western nations. Overwhelmed and with 
public patience waning for bottomless spending on foreign wars that have nothing 
to do with actual U.S. national security, tolerance is starting to wear thin for 
high-maintenance Zelensky. Which would explain NBC News’ report earlier this 
month that senior U.S. officials have broached the idea with Ukraine of it 
giving up territory to Russia to wrap up the conflict.
Zelensky himself denies any such U.S. pressure, but it’s not hard to see why the 
West would want to wrap things up in Ukraine. The underwhelming Ukrainian 
“counteroffensive” is likely to result in a frozen conflict right on Europe’s 
doorstep. European countries are increasingly coming out against endless 
billions for Ukraine. And anti-Russian sanctions have failed as a result of most 
of the world ignoring them and European companies circumventing them.
The leaked information suggests that the average American has been manipulated 
into supporting Washington’s ongoing involvement in the conflict with lies and 
half-truths. They’re about as likely to respond positively to these revelations 
as news of a cheating spouse. One would think that the leakers would be aware of 
this. Which begs the question of whether the whole intent is to prepare hearts 
and minds for an imminent divorce.
COPYRIGHT 2023 RACHEL MARSDEN