As a furious France plots its revenge for America’s treachery on its subs deal, will it take the nuclear option of quitting NATO?
By: Rachel Marsden
The anger in Paris is stratospheric towards Washington, and a wounded President Macron may just follow de Gaulle’s example from the 1960s, and say au revoir to the transatlantic military alliance.
“A stab in the back,” is how French foreign minister Jean-Yves Le Drian 
described US President Joe Biden’s announcement of a new club of three – the US, 
Great Britain and Australia – under the guise of countering China in the 
Indo-pacific region. 
The defense minister, Florence Parly, was also taken aback by Biden’s 
announcement of the group called “AUKUS.” The French are outraged over Biden’s 
unexpected announcement of America’s new massive defense contract with 
Australia, which scuppered a similar one signed by Canberra with France’s Naval 
Group in 2018. 
“The first major initiative of AUKUS will be to deliver a nuclear-powered 
submarine fleet for Australia,” Biden said. “We intend to build these submarines 
in Adelaide, Australia, in close cooperation with the United Kingdom and the 
United States.” 
Who’s Biden kidding? This entire charade is about using a Chinese bogeyman to 
keep the US military-industrial complex in the manner to which its shareholders 
have become accustomed. If it was really just about national security, there was 
already a French contract in place to achieve that. 
The betrayal is particularly jarring since it comes around the same time as two 
other events which underline the sacrifices that France has made in solidarity 
with the US. First, within hours of Biden’s announcement, French President 
Emmanuel Macron informed the world that French forces in the Sahel region of 
Africa had neutralized the leader of ISIS responsible for the death of American 
soldiers in 2017. 
Secondly, the recent chaotic US-led withdrawal from the 20-year war in 
Afghanistan left many French – whose military operations there ended in 2012 and 
training of Afghan forces concluded in 2014 – soul-searching as to whether the 
sacrifices made purely in support of its US ally in the wake of the September 
11, 2001, terrorist attacks in New York and Washington, were ultimately worth 
the costs.
Into the current climate now crash-lands this overt American-led betrayal of 
France, which reacted by cancelling a gala at the French embassy in Washington 
that was supposed to celebrate the Franco-American relationship. That’s clearly 
not going far enough.
Biden has effectively just shown America’s allies that they’re nothing more 
than vassals for serving American interests as Washington sees fit. His 
announcement sidelines not only France in any potential intelligence cooperation 
with this new venture – a country which already has overseas territories and 
considerable military assets in the region – but also other traditional allies 
like Canada and New Zealand, both of which are members of the Five Eyes group of 
intelligence-sharing Anglophone countries. 
All of these countries have been routinely riding shotgun on failed American 
foreign interventions around the world, with highly questionable returns on 
their investment relative to their sacrifice and cost. And all for what? Are 
they really any safer than if they had just stayed home and invested in shoring 
up their domestic defenses?
Macron himself has proven skeptical of the US-led NATO alliance recently, saying 
that it is “brain dead” and suggesting that it needed a new purpose beyond 
trying to keep the Cold War alive by stoking fear of Russia to keep the national 
defense coffers brimming. 
The French president has encouraged NATO to reposition itself to target 
terrorism rather than communism. Presumably neither is resonating as much 
anymore with the general Western public. Or at least they don’t view foreign 
military intervention as the best approach to addressing these issues. So now US 
focus has turned almost entirely to China and countering its influence – all 
while showing a total lack of self-awareness in light of the fact that it was 
Western nations’ selling out of its own workers in favor of offshoring 
manufacturing to cheaper labor to China that helped fuel China’s rise. 
As is often the case, America is now looking to slay the monster that it largely 
helped to create for the exact same reason: economic benefit. The pretext of 
countering China is really the only cause that has the capability of justifying 
maxed-out defense spending for years to come across all sectors, from 
conventional to cyber. China is the new cash cow for American big government. 
And the US only seems interested in determining which of its vassal states – er, 
“allies” – provide the best window-dressing for that venture, while maximizing 
its own profits. France didn’t fit the bill as it already had a contract in hand 
that the US wanted to steal.
The most dignified response that France can now make on behalf of US 
vassal-state allies would be to leave NATO’s military alliance and look to 
military cooperation agreements and missions with its European partners – 
including Russia – that make sense for a uniquely European agenda and interests. 
Former French President Charles de Gaulle already did it once, in 1966, and the 
exit lasted for 43 years. It’s time once again for France to take a stand in its 
own interests and those of its people.
COPYRIGHT 2021 RACHEL MARSDEN