EU countries close borders to Brits but not to terrorists
By: Rachel Marsden
PARIS — Terrorism couldn’t do it. Social tensions weren’t enough. Neither was
the migrant crisis born of the regime change wars sparked by Western interests
in the Middle East and Africa. But now, the COVID-19 panic has managed to
achieve what Western leaders have tried to make us all believe was beneath our
advanced state of societal sophistication: unilateral border control.
We really owe thanks to the Brits for allowing us to realize our full
border-control potential. Leaders of other Western nations didn’t hesitate to do
to them what they failed to do with China at the outset of this pandemic —
promptly slam the door in their faces. They did so within hours of British Prime
Minister Boris Johnson announcing the discovery of a new, more rapidly
propagating variant of SARS-CoV-2.
France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the Netherlands, Denmark and Portugal were among
the European Union countries to close their borders to U.K. travel. The measure
is supposed to be temporary, until they can figure out how to best deal with the
problem. Each nation acted individually in its own perceived best interests
without waiting around for any of the others.
Here in France, we didn’t see this kind of border-control leadership in response
to any of the recent terror attacks, which in some cases were perpetrated by
individuals who had been traveling between Europe and jihadist hotbeds in the
Middle East. Cherif and Said Kouachi, the Algerian-born brothers who took part
in the 2015 attack that killed 12 people at the Paris headquarters of Charlie
Hebdo magazine after it published satirical images of Prophet Mohammed, managed
to go back and forth between Europe and training camps in Yemen. They were
killed when cornered by police two days after the attack.
Recent knife attacks in France have been attributed to individuals who came into
the country under humanitarian pretexts. On Sept. 25, Zaher Hassan Mahmood, a
young Pakistani man who came to France three years ago as an “isolated minor,”
wounded two people with a butcher knife. Ibrahim Issaoui, a 21-year-old Tunisian
refugee who recently came to France via the Italian island of Lampedusa, killed
three people near a church in Nice in October.
The majority of the jihadists presumed responsible for the coordinated terrorist
attacks in and around Paris on Nov. 13, 2015, that killed 130 people, including
the victims of the massacre at the Bataclan theater, reportedly met in a
jihadist training camp in Syria. Somehow they all made it into France without
much difficulty.
And yet Brits looking to cross into France to visit friends or family this
Christmas won’t have the chance. It has taken this virus for our leaders to
invoke the sovereign right of nation-states to protect their citizens. COVID-19
has exposed a gargantuan lie perpetuated by the European Union for years: that
individual nations have to abide by collective rules and can’t take unilateral
action on behalf of their own people.
Even in the face of terrorist massacres, the EU required meetings, debate,
discussion, voting, collaboration, compromise. But when faced with a few Brits
stricken by a new variant of COVID-19, the cooperative facade went out the
window. Suddenly, it was every country for itself. The media here in France
couldn’t even keep up. They had just begun reporting that EU nations would soon
be discussing a coordinated response to the new U.K. viral threat when they
started getting press releases from countries announcing travel bans.
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau wouldn’t close a loophole that allowed
entry into Canada by foreign nationals who had their temporary migrant status in
the U.S. revoked by the Donald Trump administration, but he has kept the Canada-U.S.
border closed since March under the pretext of COVID-19. Now, he’s banned
flights from the U.K. into Canada.
“This afternoon, I convened a meeting with the Incident Response Group,” Trudeau
tweeted on Monday. “We focused on the new variant of COVID-19 identified in the
UK, and we have decided to implement new border restrictions in order to keep
you — and people right across the country — safe.”
That’s quite a leap from Trudeau’s open-borders tweets in response to Trump’s
decision in January 2017 to temporarily halt immigration to the U.S. from
countries associated with terrorism “until we know what’s going on.”
Now, every country that isn’t suicidal wants to take control of its borders to
keep its people “safe” until it can get COVID-19 under control. Let’s hope this
trend of self-preservation over political correctness becomes one of the few
lasting positive impacts of this pandemic.
COPYRIGHT 2020 RACHEL MARSDEN