IMF Chief Case Proves There's Shocking Wealth In Being A Socialist
By: Rachel Marsden
Apparently there’s some good money to be made with a career as a professional
Socialist. Dominique Strauss-Kahn, the French Socialist Party’s formerly best
hope for president and former International Monetary Fund chief now sits in a
$50,000 a month townhouse rental in Manhattan’s Tribeca district in the wake of
his Picasso-collecting heiress wife posting $1 million bail and $5 million bond.
This doesn’t include the estimated $280,000 monthly bill for detectives and
lawyers in a bid to clear him of charges of allegedly sexually assaulting a maid
at a luxury NYC hotel.
All this flaunting of wealth by someone who was supposed to be the best hope for
the great unwashed French masses has forced his party to acknowledge the
disconnect. Benoit Hamon, the Socialist Party’s spokesman, says that he
“understands that this could shock millions of French.”
Color me personally unshocked, Benoit. Strauss-Kahn – or “DSK” – is a longtime
French civil servant. Climbing to the pinnacle of public service and politics is
how the left gets rich – and it’s really the only way they can do so, aside from
marrying rich or inheriting wealth, because their business model doesn’t really
allow for much else without delving into capitalist activities. Even the
universally recognized symbol of extreme leftism, Che Guavara, was a product of
Argentine high-society and invested in a yacht company before setting out to
lead the peasants in revolution against capitalism.
DSK has been mayor, parliamentarian, minister, then subsequently collected a
$500,000 yearly salary as head of the IMF. Whenever I see a wealthy
self-described socialist, it’s a pretty sure bet that, like DSK here, they fell
into a giant pile of someone else’s cash at some point. Redistribution of wealth
primarily towards themselves is how socialists roll: What’s Jacques Taxpayer’s
is mine. What’s wifey’s is mine. What enters my hotel room is (allegedly) mine…A
French BFM TV reporter broadcasting live recently from DSK’s new apartment held
up two NYC newspaper covers expressing shock at his monthy living costs,
explaining to French viewers that although Americans have less of a complex
about money than the French, they’re still raising eyebrows at the lavish
spending. That's because his new spread is theoretically supposed to substitute
for a jail cell. Not too many people charged with rape end up landing a massive
new pad with a “girl’s room” or "nanny's room" within a week of release – let
alone someone who was supposed to represent the great hope for the so-called
people’s party back home. It's hard not to marvel at the tone deafness of it
all.
Not to say that socialists don’t deserve to be well-paid for a productive job
well done, but the key word is “productive”. The position of IMF chief shouldn’t
be held by anyone for whom it’s the best paying gig they’ve ever known. Instead,
it should pay nothing in salary and allow for bonus performance-based payouts.
For example, DSK was set lay out an austerity plan and strategy for Greece to
reduce its debt in exchange for a 110 billion Euro bailout from Eurozone
countries. The head of the IMF shouldn’t get a cent of salary until his advice
pans out and Greece turns a profit based on it. The same goes for the 78 billion
Euros the EU just gave Portugal to sort itself out. The IMF chief ought to
moralize to them as he’s apt to do, and if his hot air manages to push their
sinking ship’s sail in the right direction, then he should get a cut. Instead,
we hear that countries like Tunisia went from 3.7% growth to 1.7% growth,
according to the IMF. Whoops, looks like global governor DSK underperformed.
Those who want to be responsible for the world should then take responsibility
for the world.
The great paradox is that Socialists like DSK want to run their own countries
and the entire planet while enjoying the power, prestige and salaries associated
with doing so. But at no point are they ever accountable or responsible for any
results. If they ever did solve the world’s problems, they’d be out of jobs. If
countries couldn’t depend on the IMF, they’d be forced to get themselves in
order, which would likely mean cutting costs and limiting government. A limited
government wouldn’t rely so heavily on civil servants and clunky paper-shuffling
administrations. DSK and other self-proclaimed societal managers would have to
find something more productive to do.
Being a man of the people moving societal goalposts around, making all sorts of
rules, and telling others how to live pays wonderfully and represents the
pinnacle of socialist achievement. That’s the dirty little secret the French are
discovering with the DSK affair. It’s hard to make a living as a socialist
otherwise -- on an open, level and fair playing field with everyone else. The
ones who secretly aspire to it are hardly going to protest it. DSK’s biggest
claim to fame prior to his IMF stint involved bringing in the now-repealed
35-hour French workweek, handicapping capitalism and forcing employers to pay
the same salary for less productivity. Ironically it’s that same kind of
thinking from which he and the IMF had to rescue bankrupt EU countries. The
private sector equivalent would be someone who burns down your house then offers
you the chance to pay him to rebuild it. DSK and socialists are good at creating
employment and wealth – for themselves.
COPYRIGHT 2011 RACHEL MARSDEN