Define ‘Nazi’: Western media muddies history to cover up Canada’s SS scandal
By: Rachel Marsden
“Fighting against the USSR didn’t necessarily make you a Nazi,” Politico says. Maybe. But Yaroslav Hunka definitely was one
Historical revisionists are now trying to argue that actual Nazi soldiers
were just anti-Soviet resisters.
We knew that it was coming. It was only a matter of time. And now attempts to
whitewash the actions of actual Nazis from WWII have begun – all because a bunch
of ignoramuses in the Canadian parliament cheered one alongside Ukrainian
President Vladimir Zelensky, and it all just makes Ukraine and its Western
supporters look bad.
It also makes Western lawmakers look like they have no clue when it comes to
Nazism in Ukraine – either past or present. So instead of asking questions about
their judgment, it’s time to ask whether you’ve just misunderstood Nazis.
The newly-resigned Canadian House Speaker introduced Ukrainian one-time Waffen-SS
soldier Yaroslav Hunka as a Ukrainian (and naturalized Canadian) who fought
Russians back in the day, yet apparently no one bothered to do the math. The
Soviet Union was allied with the West against Nazi Germany. Nazi Germany was who
fought against the Russians. Okay, it wasn’t the only one – there were others,
like the Polish Home Army, which fought against both the Soviets and the
Germans. So maybe Hunka was part of that? That’s the theoretical explanation the
German Foreign Office offered when it emerged that the German ambassador to
Canada was also present at the standing ovation in parliament. Yeah, that must
have been it. A Ukrainian going to war to protect Ukraine from the Soviet Union
by joining the Polish Home Army. Sounds plausible.
Oh, no, wait, he was actually in the Waffen SS, namely the First Galician
Division – a unit that mostly consisted of Ukrainians and killed Poles and Jews.
He joined it voluntarily and later described his decision in an essay published
by an American online magazine. And now Poland wants him extradited for alleged
war crimes.
Leaving aside convoluted historical revisionism, those who don’t acknowledge the
nuance in this Nazi’s service are just feeding Russian propaganda, according to
some Western commentators. “This history is complicated,” one wrote recently in
POLITICO. “Because fighting against the USSR at the time didn’t necessarily make
you a Nazi, just someone who had an excruciating choice over which of these two
terror regimes to resist.”
It's pretty safe to say that someone who volunteered for the combat branch of
the Nazi Party's paramilitary Schutzstaffel (SS) organization is an actual Nazi
– unlike Canadian Freedom Convoy truckers and their supporters who were treated
like Nazis by this same Canadian government, which went as far as to even block
some of their bank accounts. Have Hunka and the actual Nazis who were welcomed
to Canada in the wake of the war ever had their bank accounts blocked? Or is
that just for people who honk too loudly in protest? Who’s more embarrassing to
Canada: naturalized Nazis, truckers, or the parliament?
So apparently, we’re supposed to now believe that Waffen SS soldiers aren’t
really Nazis, just anti-Soviet resistors. Are we supposed to also look deep into
the heart and intentions of each individual who served voluntarily in the Nazi
uniform to determine how they really felt about it? Who knows – perhaps Hunka
didn’t really mean it when pledging loyalty to the Führer. Maybe he’s like an
employee at Home Depot who can’t be held responsible for store policies – even
though, in the case of Nazis, that didn’t fly either, as the Nuremberg Trials
proved.
It takes some Olympic-grade mental gymnastics to suggest that neither Zelensky,
who’s Ukrainian himself, nor Canadian Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland,
who holds degrees in Russian and Slavic studies from Oxford and Harvard and
whose grandfather edited a Ukrainian Nazi newspaper during WWII, couldn’t have
known that this guy just might be a Nazi… but they whooped it up for him anyway.
But now, their actions are on the verge of being reframed.
It's all such a backside-covering move to compensate for a total lack of due
diligence – the same kind that was demonstrated when it emerged that Canada had
knowingly trained and equipped Azov Battalion neo-Nazis for Ukraine’s current
conflict with Russia while seemingly being bothered far more by the notion that
the press risked finding out about it than by the idea of training guys with
Nazi tattoos.
To accept historic reality, instead of trying hard to weasel Justin Trudeau and
the Canadian establishment out of this embarrassment, is to let “Russian
propaganda” win. Seriously. That’s the argument. “Canada’s enemies have thus
latched on to these simple narratives, alongside concerned citizens in Canada
itself, with the misstep over Hunka being used by Russia and its backers to
attack Ukraine, Canada and each country’s association with the other,” wrote the
POLITICO commentator. Know who else has “latched on” to the “I can’t believe
they could be that dumb” narrative around this Canadian Nazipalooza? Honest
people and patriots who are, in fact, less interested in peddling narratives
that serve a handful of establishment elites and more interested in defending
historical realities that serve all of humanity rather than reframing or
perverting them to suit an ideological cause – anti-Russian or otherwise.
Trudeau said in the same breath as his apology for the Hunka incident that “it's
going to be really important that all of us push back against Russian
propaganda, Russian disinformation, and continue our steadfast and unequivocal
support for Ukraine.” It seems that some have already jumped on the opportunity
to redefine defense of well-established historical record as “Russian
propaganda” and to impose the whims of Western leaders as the new dystopian
reality.
COPYRIGHT 2023 RACHEL MARSDEN