This ‘democratic’ nation has turned into a dictatorship
By: Rachel Marsden
Canada’s treatment of Freedom Convoy protesters like terrorists allows it to bring in a social credit system via the backdoor
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and his cabinet were urged by their
American counterparts last week to put an end to the disruption of trade between
the two countries caused by the Canadian Freedom Convoy truckers and their
supporters, who were hanging out on the Ambassador Bridge that links Detroit,
Michigan with Windsor, Ontario, and carries about a quarter of all trade between
the two nations by value of goods.
Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and Transportation Secretary Pete
Buttigieg poked their noses into Canada’s domestic affairs and suggested Trudeau
should “use federal powers to resolve this situation,” according to CNN.
Look, it’s really easy, eh? The truckers want freedom from mandates. These US
officials want freedom to profit. So, all Trudeau had to do is give everyone the
freedom they seek by dropping whatever is left of federal vaccine mandates which
require, for instance, presentation of a digital ID linked to anti-Covid jabs in
order to travel anywhere within or outside of the country. Then the truckers
would go home, the protests would end, roads and bridges between the two
countries would decongest, and life would go on as before the rapidly fading
pandemic.
But Trudeau apparently did not understand the assignment – unless he thought
the assignment was to do a poor imitation of a tinpot authoritarian. He had a
choice. He could have responded to the American officials’ call to use “federal
powers” by declaring a complete repeal of all remaining federal health
restrictions. Instead, he took the term to mean a crackdown on protesters, and
invoked a rare law that’s directly associated in the minds of Canadians with
terrorists.
Outside of the two world wars, the War Measures Act, which became the
Emergencies Act in 1988, was invoked exactly one time in the history of Canada –
by Trudeau’s father, former prime minister Pierre Trudeau. He used it in the
context of the October Crisis: a series of events in October 1970 that saw
Quebec separatists kidnap a British diplomat and murder the province’s deputy
premier. In other words, during a period of domestic terrorism.
Allowing for the suspension of civil liberties, the law is designed to be
declared in the event of insurrection, invasion, or war. It gives the federal
government special powers at times of national emergency to do things that the
law would normally disallow. Like, for example, cutting off the funds of anyone
it decides is involved in the protest movement.
The new rules targeting the Freedom Convoy declare it a duty of Canadian
institutions to “determine on a continuing basis whether they are in possession
or control of property that is owned, held or controlled by or on behalf of a
designated person,” meaning “any individual or entity that is engaged, directly
or indirectly, in an activity” related to the protests or convoy. The
institutions that are required to block the assets of these individuals who dare
express themselves peacefully against Trudeau’s sanitary authoritarianism
include banks, companies, trusts, loan providers, and fundraising platforms.
In other words, if the government doesn’t like your political views, it has now
introduced a mechanism by which it can deprive you of your own resources or
prevent you from acquiring any. With Trudeau apparently fighting tooth and nail
to maintain Canada in this state of perpetual emergency at federal level, he is
ensuring the maintenance and indefinite prolongation of digital identities under
the guise of health passports (at least in order to travel or, in some cases,
work).
And now he has just introduced a means by which the government could leverage
this declared emergency to ultimately associate someone’s identity with their
political beliefs and behavior. Tack on the digital identity of the federal
health passports, and you have a means of preventing people from living based on
political beliefs as decided by government with just one push of a button
somewhere in an increasingly interconnected and harmonized electronic system.
And all without any immediate means of recourse or appeal.
The fact that the updated War Measures Act has even entered Trudeau’s mind as
an option to deal with a bunch of people honking and cheering for freedom, while
racking up seatbelt infractions, is incredibly troubling, particularly in light
of how conciliatory he has been towards actual armed combatants – such as those
in Ukraine. It’s apparently OK for Trudeau to allow Canada to train them to
fight Russians and to even send lethal weapons ($7.8 million worth, to be exact)
once they’re integrated into the Ukrainian Army. Canada’s alleged role in
training the anti-Russian Azov Battalion proxy fighters, alongside American
intelligence, as revealed by the Ottawa Citizen in November 2021, is currently
under investigation by the Department of National Defense.
So, Trudeau is ordering that Canadian freedom fighters even bringing gas cans to
help fuel the trucker convoy be susceptible to asset freezes, yet he’s fine with
sending actual weapons to his designated “freedom fighters” in another country?
OK then, just keeping score on the hypocrimeter.
Trudeau’s actions will create a chilling effect on Canadian free speech. People
will think twice before expressing support for anything other than a cause that
the government has deemed “lawful” – a definition no doubt subjected to the
whims of those in power, like the sanitary restrictions. Indeed, the extent to
which Trudeau’s government now feels comfortable extending its reach was
demonstrated when Justice Minister David Larnetti rather alarmingly said, “If
you are a member of a pro-Trump movement who’s donating [to the convoy]… you
ought to be worried” about your bank account being frozen. This is the talk of a
dictatorship.
It’s a far cry from the Canada that Trudeau himself promoted as an opposition
member of parliament when he reminded then Prime Minister Stephen Harper of his
own words from 2005. “When a government starts trying to cancel dissent or avoid
dissent is when it’s rapidly losing its moral authority to govern.”
Trudeau isn’t just trying to cancel peaceful dissent under the guise of security. He’s single-handedly imposing a brutal systemic crackdown on it. Welcome to the very first iteration of a Chinese-style social credit regime in the Western world.
COPYRIGHT 2022 RACHEL MARSDEN