Global coronavirus solidarity means circling the economic drain together
By: Rachel Marsden
PARIS — I sat in the middle of a small garden on a traffic roundabout down
the street from my Paris home, staring down the empty roads stretching out from
it. The small patch was the only open green space that I could find within the
one-kilometer radius allowed for exercise. This outing, registered via a new
government-issued phone app that generates a QR code for police to scan at
checkpoints, began just a few minutes before the daily ritual of citizens
appearing at their windows to clap for health care workers amid the coronavirus
panic.
A phenomenon that began Europe and has caught on worldwide, the clapping is
portrayed as a heartwarming show of solidarity. But sitting there underneath all
those apartment windows lining that roundabout, suddenly surrounded by spoon-clangers
and pot-bashers, I saw something troubling: mindless automated compliance. It
smacked of trained seals flapping their fins together upon command from a
trainer at an aquarium show.
This complacency leaves an unpressured government more opportunity to control
the narrative, if only because people adhere to it so willingly. Citizens
clapping and barking en masse like the more talented SeaWorld residents bestows
exceptionalism on the situation, as if we’ve never seen anything like it before.
But in reality, every seasonal virus outbreak in France for the past few years
has resulted in numerous screaming headlines about shortages of hospital
resources.
French emergency medical services issued a “no bed challenge” in March 2018 to
track the number of patients treated on stretchers in hallways due to lack of
space. Francois Braun, president of Samu-Urgences de France, told Sud Ouest
newspaper: “In winter there are flu problems. What is happening this year is
different. The main flu episode is far behind us now. However, the situation has
continued to worsen. The epidemic episode is therefore not the only
explanation.”
An article from Europe1 that same month proclaimed that, “The health system
cannot meet needs and people die on stretchers.”
In February 2019, LCI TV ran an online article about the situation repeating
itself yet again: “As the flu hits the country head on, the epidemic is
saturating hospitals.”
But none of the previous seasonal virus episodes resulted in the collective
economic suicide of Western nations as a result of a health strategy. No one was
“clapping for carers” from windows. There was no daily death toll featured at
the top of the nightly news. People were going about their lives, picking their
noses and coughing on packed public buses, licking their fingers while loading
up at supermarket salad bars, filling crowded gyms, bars and restaurants. The
public had no clue that health services were overwhelmed.
Today, we’re in a different situation because our governments have chosen a path
that leads to mass financial destitution. Just look at the pressure exerted on a
country that isn’t conforming to the current status quo: Sweden. The
Scandinavian country has so far opted against a draconian lockdown of businesses
and individuals, choosing instead to limit mass gatherings and implore citizens
to adopt commonsense measures regarding hygiene and personal space. Media
reports breathlessly speculate about whether the freedom-favoring policy can
last, or whether it will cause the Swedish death toll to explode.
But what if Sweden stays the course and fares no worse than other Western
nations from a public health perspective, yet emerges with a healthy economy?
Wouldn’t that cast a bad light on the collective hysterics of countries whose
virus-control strategies have virtually guaranteed that we’ll all be forced to
relive the Great Depression?
The pressure on Sweden to conform to the financial-destitution strategy will
continue to be enormous. Health statistics coming out of Sweden will be
scrutinized by those looking to validate the lockdown strategy in much the same
way that weather patterns are scrutinized by people looking to justify their
ideologies in the climate debate.
This “war on the coronavirus” looks a lot like the “war on poverty” that’s long
been waged by the left but has never actually been won. In both cases,
solidarity is imposed through peer pressure, and it’s a race to the fiscal
bottom. Nations profess to be in this war together, even as they intercept each
other’s shipments of medical equipment as if they were Black Friday shoppers at
Walmart. (Reports indicate that the U.S. has been especially aggressive in its
pursuit of face masks, going so far as to disrupt deliveries to other nations.)
With both “wars,” victory is never clearly defined. Some want us locked up until
there are no new cases at all. Yeah, just imagine all the harm we can avoid if
we all stay locked inside forever while the world collapses around us.
Hey, look, it’s almost broke o’clock, folks. Time to get those pots and pans up
to the window.
COPYRIGHT 2020 RACHEL MARSDEN