It looks like the Canadian military’s covert Covid propaganda operation has made me, an unjabbed citizen, an enemy of the state
By: Rachel Marsden
The shocking revelation that the armed forces implemented a secret information campaign in 2020 to brainwash people over the pandemic is proof of deliberate intent to quash critical and independent thought and freedoms.
As a Canadian citizen who recovered from Covid and acquired natural immunity and
antibodies without the anti-Covid vaccine, the government doesn’t much
appreciate my narrative.
Proof lies in the fact that when I arrived back home in Vancouver from my work
base in Europe in August, the federal government demanded that I pay for my own
three-day imprisonment in a government mandated facility at a cost of up to
$2,000. Refusal resulted in being ordered in writing to immediately get back on
a plane and leave my own country under threat of penalties up to and including
imprisonment. All because my acquired immunity didn’t jibe with the government’s
“one size fits all” two-jab narrative.
Now I’ve learned that the Canadian military was deployed against
unconventional and inconvenient narratives like mine in favor of lockstep
groupthink. Does that make me an enemy of the state?
The Canadian military’s Joint Operations Command implemented a propaganda
campaign in April 2020 with the intent to manipulate unsuspecting Canadians into
falling in line with the federal government’s official positions on Covid-19.
The brainwashing operation’s termination was ordered a month later, but in the
meantime, it “relied on propaganda techniques similar to those employed during
the Afghanistan war,” according to the Ottawa Citizen’s exclusive report on
documents obtained under Access to Information.
The operation’s aim, according to the military, was to “head off civil
disobedience by Canadians during the coronavirus pandemic and to bolster
government messages about the pandemic.”
Generally, government intelligence operations rely on ear-bending friendly
journalists and think-tank analysts to publish the state’s talking points in
mainstream publications or online. Washington Post journalist Carl Bernstein,
best-known for breaking the Watergate scandal, wrote in a Rolling Stone magazine
article titled “The CIA and the Media,” back in 1977, how the CIA used
“journalist-operatives” to “plant subtly concocted pieces of misinformation.”
He further noted: “There are perhaps a dozen well known columnists and broadcast
commentators whose relationships with the CIA go far beyond those normally
maintained between reporters and their sources. They are referred to at the
Agency as ‘known assets’ and can be counted on to perform a variety of
undercover tasks; they are considered receptive to the Agency’s point of view on
various subjects.”
Another known tactic used by military intelligence to manipulate its own
country’s citizens is to send out retired generals to spew talking points on
various media platforms. In 2008, the Los Angeles Times wrote of the Pentagon’s
Iraq War era “message multipliers” program. At the time, Democratic Congressman
Paul Hodes had introduced an amendment – overwhelmingly adopted – to investigate
the Pentagon’s public opinion manipulation program, unveiled by the New York
Times as “cultivating former military officers who became regulars on Fox News,
CNN and the broadcast networks.”
“They were fed administration talking points, believing they were getting
independent military analysis,” Hodes said at the time of the public
manipulation campaign.
So despite the Ottawa Citizen’s reporting that the program was officially
quashed one month after its deployment, we really don’t know how much damage was
done and to what extent the propaganda distribution it sparked may have since
become autonomous and taken on a life of its own.
Canadians now need to know exactly what “government messages” were propagandized
and where, and what “enemy narratives” were targeted for smears. Only then is it
possible for the public to assess how much of the current conventional wisdom is
the result of deliberate boosting or suppressing.
It’s a sad fact that the Canadian military has seen fit to use similar
techniques to those that US intelligence has long deployed on foreign opponents.
Declassified US intelligence manuals drafted in 1987 show that both the Pentagon
and the CIA used similar propaganda techniques in Latin America, with the aim of
indiscriminately brainwashing both civilians and guerrillas to support the
US-backed movements. And like with the Canadian military campaign, it involved
monitoring innocent people for their thoughts and beliefs while minimizing
consideration of both basic human rights and the rule of law.
Lest we forget that Canadians were also victims of some of the most egregious
brainwashing experimentation under the CIA-led MK-Ultra program to test various
mind control methods, including LSD, sensory deprivation, and electroshock
therapy, on unwitting Canadians at the Allan Memorial Institute in Montreal
between 1957 and 1964.
We really have no idea how deep the rabbit hole goes with this recent revelation
that Canadians were once again treated as experimental guinea pigs – this time
in the interest of quashing critical thinking or dissent amid the pandemic. What
we do see, however, it’s probably just the tip of the iceberg, and that its aim
of creating a compliant citizenry has been successful.
More than three in four double-jabbed Canadians consider their unjabbed
fellow citizens selfish and irresponsible, according to a new Leger poll. If
they’re jabbed, and they have so much confidence in the jab preventing them
getting ill, then what do they care what anyone else does? How much has the
Canadian military and government propaganda played a role in shaping their
views?
The whole truth about the extent of this psychological abuse of innocent
Canadian civilians needs to come out – if only so the manipulated can see to
what extent they were coerced into turning against their fellow citizens for
simply making a different personal choice in what, after all, is supposed to
still be a free and democratic country.
COPYRIGHT 2021 RACHEL MARSDEN