'America First' is a battle cry for the oppressed middle class
By: Rachel Marsden
PARIS -- It's a sign that something is amiss when an American presidential 
candidate ruffles feathers by announcing, as Republican front-runner Donald 
Trump did recently, that the theme of his administration would be "America 
First."
"No country has ever prospered that failed to put its own interests first," 
Trump said in a speech outlining his foreign policy. "Both our friends and 
enemies put their countries above ours, and we, while being fair to them, must 
do the same. We will no longer surrender this country, or its people, to the 
false song of globalism."
With this statement, Trump has positioned himself as a champion of the silent 
middle-class majority and has differentiated himself from his likely opponent in 
the general election, Hillary Clinton.
Some critics have already called Trump's "America First" worldview dangerous. 
You'd think it would be a no-brainer for a U.S. presidential candidate to 
prioritize American interests. But Trump's detractors are rightfully reading 
something more significant into his slogan: that it places the interests of the 
middle class above those of the special interests that have hijacked the 
national agenda.
The middle class has long been exploited by the policies of the establishment 
elites who control Washington and other Western democracies. American workers 
have seen their wages stagnate, or have lost their jobs, under the pretext of 
tolerating an influx of immigrants willing to work for less. They've watched as 
special-interest groups have brought unwarranted attention to fringe issues.
The middle class has also seen its jobs shipped overseas. This is critical to 
survival of American industry, we're told. Yet the 50 biggest companies in the 
United States "have stashed more than a trillion dollars offshore and used more 
than 1,600 subsidiaries in tax havens to avoid billions of dollars in tax each 
year," according to a recent report from the anti-poverty organization Oxfam 
America. This is the sort of thing Trump was referring to when he mentioned "the 
false song of globalism." Companies cited by Oxfam include Pfizer, Goldman 
Sachs, Dow Chemical, Chevron, Wal-Mart, IBM and Procter & Gamble.
American leadership leans hard on the middle-class worker bees who quietly and 
diligently pay their taxes so that the government can spend recklessly, with 
little to show for their spending and little accountability. The middle class 
could form the most powerful political action committee in the U.S., except that 
the average middle-class voter is too busy trying to keep his or her head above 
water from day to day. With special interests dominating American politics, it's 
been years since any leader was willing to step up and champion the middle 
class.
The success of the Trump campaign is evidence of a reawakening of the 
middle-class voice in America the likes of which we haven't seen since the 
Reagan years.
Of course, when the working class supports a leader who places their interests 
above those of the establishment elites, there's bound to be a backlash. We've 
seen this with the relentless rhetoric against Russian President Vladimir Putin. 
Intent on building up domestic industries and diversifying the Russian economy 
to replace declining oil revenues, Putin has cut trade deals that don't sell out 
the Russian people.
Establishment elites have good reason to worry about Trump's "America First" 
platform. Their influence on politicians leads to policies that further enhance 
their wealth, however destructive those policies may be to the middle class. But 
why should the wealthiest Americans worry about the average worker when they 
retreat to their gilded residences around the world and avoid having to engage 
with the society they've had a hand in destroying? While they share a legitimate 
gripe with the middle class about tax rates, America's wealthy have chosen to 
further their own interests rather than close ranks with the middle class and 
use their political clout to effect change for the good of all.
Globalization has its indisputable advantages -- specifically, ease of 
communication and movement -- but the concept has careened off the rails.
A call to order is long overdue, and Trump is intent on leading that initiative. 
As a result, the silent and oppressed majority may be on the verge of getting 
their voice back. It's no wonder America's rich and powerful are worried.
COPYRIGHT 2016 RACHEL MARSDEN